RSS

Tag Archives: unit test

DynamicProxyGenAssembly2

DynamicProxyGenAssembly2 is a temporary assembly built by mocking systems that use CastleProxy like Moq or NSubsitute. It is generated when the mock is needed and disposed of after the tests are finished.

Tested on:
Moq 4.10 https://github.com/moq/moq4
.Net 4.5

Following is AssemblyInfo.cs in QC.Client project.

using System.Reflection;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

[assembly: AssemblyTitle("QC.Client")]
[assembly: AssemblyDescription("")]
[assembly: AssemblyConfiguration("")]
[assembly: AssemblyCompany("")]
[assembly: AssemblyProduct("QC.Client")]
[assembly: AssemblyCopyright("Copyright ©  2019")]
[assembly: AssemblyTrademark("")]
[assembly: AssemblyCulture("")]
[assembly: ComVisible(false)]

[assembly: Guid("d62d1a60-782a-46d8-b5f5-2f6d12ad1339")]

[assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.0.0")]
[assembly: AssemblyFileVersion("1.0.0.0")]
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("QC.ClientTest")]

Following is class i want to test.
UserManagement.cs (In QC.Client project)

namespace QC.Client
{
    public class UserManagement
    {
        public void UpdateUser(string address)
        {
            var executer = new Executer();
            executer.Run();
        }
    }
}

Executer.cs (In QC.Client project)

namespace QC.Client
{
    public class Executer
    {
        internal virtual bool Run()
        {
            return true;
        }
    }
}

Following is my unit test.
UserManagementTest.cs (In QC.ClientTest project)

using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using Moq;
using QC.Client;

namespace QC.ClientTest
{
    [TestClass]
    public class UserManagementTest
    {
        [TestMethod]
        public void UpdateUserShouldWork()
        {
            // Mock
            var mock = new Mock();
            mock.Setup(x => x.Run());

            // Act
            var userManagement = new UserManagement();
            userManagement.UpdateUser("Test Address");

            // Assert
            mock.Verify(x => x.Run(), Times.Once);
        }
    }
}

Problem
MS Test throwing following error when unit testing internal member of a class in different project.
When unit test in above `UserManagementTest.cs` is run, MS Test throw following error:

Message: Test method QC.ClientTest.UserManagementTest.UpdateUserShouldWork threw exception:
System.ArgumentException: Cannot set up Executer.Run because it is not accessible to the proxy generator used by Moq:
Can not create proxy for method Boolean Run() because it or its declaring type is not accessible. Make it public, or internal and mark your assembly with [assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2")] attribute, because assembly QC.Client is not strong-named.

Note:
– MS Test only throw exception if the accessor of method being tested is internal. In above example it is `Executer.Run()`.
– Virtual keyword in method being tested is to allow Moq to mock the method.

Solution is to simply add following code in AssemblyInfo.cs

[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2")]

Sources
Stackoverflow

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 17, 2019 in General

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Unit Test Internal Members

Applies to .Net application in Visual Studio 2010 and up.

Say I have C# project (call it QC project). In the project, I have class that has internal member(s) like this:

namespace QC
{
    public class PersonService
    {
        public bool PromotePerson(string userName)
        {
        }

        internal bool FindPerson(string userName)
        {
        }
    }
}

For unit test, I’d created separate project (call it QCTest project). Because internal members can only be accessed in same assembly, I won’t be able to invoke `QC.PersonService.FindPerson(string userName)` method from QCTest project.

To overcome this issue, in `AssemblyInfo.cs` of project being tested (in my case, QC project), simply add

[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("QCTest")]

After rebuilding my solution, I am able to access `QC.PersonService.FindPerson(string userName)` in my QCTest project.

As an added bonus, if you use mock library like Moq or Rhino and try to mock internal members, you most likely need to add:

[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2")]

What is `DynamicProxyGenAssembly2` ?

DynamicProxyGenAssembly2 is a temporary assembly built by mocking systems that use CastleProxy like Moq or NSubsitute. It is generated when the mock is needed and disposed of after the tests are finished.

Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/17179923

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 18, 2019 in General

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Unit Testing DTO Classes

Reason why I unit test my DTO (Data Transfer Object) classes are because I pass these classes to client app and client app might use them and expect certain properties in response. Sometimes I change DTO properties that I used in client app and forget to refactor client app.
By unit testing my DTO classes, it acts as reminder for me to refactor client app whenever DTO properties (or its name) changes.

For example, I have Person DTO.

Person.cs

public class Person
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Age { get; set; }
}

To unit test, I would create PersonMirror DTO.

public class PersonMirror
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Age { get; set; }
}

Then use following helper class to unit test my DTO.

public class TestHelper
{
    public static void CompareType()
    {
        var errorMessage = "Type: {0}; Property: {1}";

        var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T));
        var instanceType = instance.GetType();
        var mirror = Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(TMirror));
        var mirrorType = mirror.GetType();
        var mirrorProperties = mirrorType.GetProperties();

        // Remove 'Mirror' convention
        var mirrorTypeName = mirrorType.Name;
        if (mirrorType.Name.IndexOf("Mirror") > 0)
        {
            mirrorTypeName = mirrorType.Name.Substring(0, mirrorType.Name.IndexOf("Mirror"));
        }

        // Compare type name
        Assert.AreEqual(mirrorTypeName, instanceType.Name);

        // Compare properties
        foreach (var mirrorProperty in mirrorProperties)
        {
            var instanceProperty = instanceType.GetProperty(mirrorProperty.Name);

            Assert.IsNotNull(instanceProperty, string.Format(errorMessage, instanceType.FullName, mirrorProperty.Name));
        }
    }
}

Usage (using MS Test):
PersonTest.cs

[TestClass]
public class PersonTest
{
    [TestMethod]
    public void TestPersonDto()
    {
        TestHelper.CompareType<Person, PersonMirror>();
    }    
}
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 18, 2019 in General

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Karma: Only Run 1 Test

Useful hack to only run 1 test in Karma.

Instead of ‘it’, change test declaration to ‘fit’.
Example:

    fit('should create', () => {
        expect(component).toBeTruthy();
    });

This will force Karma to only run ‘should create’ test.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 22, 2018 in General

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Mocking Generic Method with NSubstitute

The generic method:


public interface ICacheService
{
    T Get<T>(string id);
}

User object in NSubstitute to mock the generic method.


private ICacheService MockICacheService()
{
    var service = Substitute.For<ICacheService>();

    // Return Models
    object returnForAny = null;

    // Mock
    service.Get<object>(Arg.Any<string>()).ReturnsForAnyArgs(returnForAny);

    return service;
}

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 13, 2017 in General

 

Tags: ,

Return Null in NSubstitute Mock Framework

The API is not intuitive, at least not for me. So, I have to figure out how to return null with this mocking framework I have never used before.

var service = Substitute.For<ISomethingService>();

// Mock
service.Get<IEnumerable<SomeDomain>>(Arg.Any<string>()).ReturnsForAnyArgs(x => null);

Normally, I would just to .ReturnsForAnyArgs(null), not the case with NSubstitute.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on May 27, 2015 in General

 

Tags: ,

Unit Testing WIF’s ClaimsPrincipalPermission.CheckAccess

WIF 4.5 has ClaimsPrincipalPermission.CheckAccess method, very useful to check user’s authorization. You can use this as method call or attribute.

// Imperative method call
using System.IdentityModel.Services;
public ActionResult Index()
{
    ClaimsPrincipalPermission.CheckAccess("foo", "bar");

    return View();
}

// Attribute
[ClaimsPrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Operation="foo", Resource="bar")]
public ActionResult ViewFoobar()
{
    return View();
}

Either way, how do we unit test this? My approach is to first abstract out ClaimsPrincipalPermission and create a new wrapper class that will be injected to the dependent class.

Abstract Out

using System.IdentityModel.Services;

public class ClaimsPrincipalWrapper : IClaimsPrincipalWrapper
{
    public void CheckAccess(string resource, string action)
    {
        ClaimsPrincipalPermission.CheckAccess(resource, action);
    }
}

Dependency Injection

using System.IdentityModel.Services;

public class HomeController : Controller
{
    private readonly IClaimsPrincipalWrapper _ClaimsPrincipalWrapper;

    public HomeController(IClaimsPrincipalWrapper claimsPrincipalWrapper)
    {
        _ClaimsPrincipalWrapper = claimsPrincipalWrapper;
    }

    public ActionResult Index()
    {
        _ClaimsPrincipalWrapper.CheckAccess("foo", "bar");

        return View();
    }
}

Unit Test

[TestMethod]
public void TestIndex()
{
    // Arrange
    var _claimsPrincipal = new Mock<IClaimsPrincipalWrapper>();
    _claimsPrincipal.Setup(m => m.CheckAccess(It.IsAny<string>, It.IsAny<string>));
    var _controller = new HomeController(_claimsPrincipalMock.Object);

    // Act
    var _result = _controller.Index() as ViewResult;

    // Assert
    Assert.IsTrue(_result.View != null);
}
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 4, 2015 in General

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

 
%d bloggers like this: